Share This Document
Copy and Paste URL
Submit to Social Services
Submit to:
No description. Ask the publisher to add a description
38 Pages
Date Added |
about 1 year ago |
Category |
|
Tags |
|
Groups |
|
Type |
No Document Type. |
Awards |
|
Copyright |
|
More info » |
|
Meier- 'today I have a lot of questions, when you allow.Semjase - If there are not too many.
Semjase- if there are not too many
Meier- I don't know; my first concerns the matter/rough-material stuff. what actually is it?
Semjase - matter is a sizable idea. It is a solid form of energy, being sizable.
Meier- That is evident, but how does it originate?
Semjase - The principle is very easy, but I am not allowed to tell it. but it is such, that all energy can be changed into solid matter. It is also necessary, to bundle the concerned energy securely and to concentrate it highly, thus it may be converted into solid matter. By this, the elementary building blocks of the solid components of matter are generated; neutron, proton and electron. From those then form the atoms and the variety of chemical compounds, which then in their different aggregation states form the solid outer manifestation, which is known to your scientists. Solid energy as well as the original energy are of the same value in each direction. This means, origin energy is absolutely matter, as origin matter is absolutely energy as well. This means that, without exception, everything in the Universe consists of matter or energy. Both terms, energy and matter, represent basically one and the same, but precisely in their separate forms: finematerial and coarse-material. Coarse-material is matter; finematerial is energy.
Meier- well, allright, but this doesn't explain my question . I namely want to know how matter rises originally.
Semjase - From out of basic energy, of course.
Meier- You render too less precise. I think, that before the basic energy, there must be something else. Because, from what I know, always two individual units, belonging together, result in a unit again.....
Semjase - You are tireless, and you give me a predicament.
Meier - I don't' intend to.
Semjase - okay now, I shall explain all for you, as far as I shall be allowed, though you seem to know more in this respect, then we know about you: matter is the embodiment of idea. As energy, the matter is finmaterial; and as matter, just highly concentrated and condensed. one can generate both kinds by apparatus, which you already do in different ways. Normally they are generated quite naturally, that is by spiritual forces, which is preceded by idea. The basic source for this is The Creation, a vast spiritual reservoir, a factor, which again embodies the original energy. From it rises idea. The force of Spirit then (which and who again embodies energy) condenses and concentrates the idea to finematerial energy, which then by still higher concentration becomes coarsematerial, or matter .......
Meier- Then in fact, the whole Universe is, inside and out, only of finematerial and coarsematerial energy (which is) compressed and concentrated idea?
Semjase - Certainly.
Meier- But then, what is this vast spiritual formation, the factor of The Creation?
Semjase - It c...
Hi,
Science is a very interesting subject. We all are familiar with this subject. This subject is full of knowledge.
NYK
&l t;a href=http://makemoney.biz oppjunction.com>Make Money</a>
I posted a new version of this document with the fonts corrected.
http://www .scribd.com/doc/3247933/T he-sun-is-powered-by-the- super-massive-black-hole
I couldn't see anything. Have you retracted your paper?
Hi jamessavik,
The sun energy is produced from the magnetic fields by magnetic induction according to Faraday's Law. The magnetic fields that cross the sun produce strong electric currents that heat the sun. The hot red wires of toasters are example of heating by an electric current.
The current neutrino experiments show conflicting evidence and there are many future experiments that will try to clear this.
The magnetic fields from the center of the galaxy does not reach the sun directly but through numerous magnetic eddies that prevalent in the galactic disk.
Here are the main points of the theory that easily explain it:
1. The sun energy source is from magnetic fields from the galactic center.
2. The heat from the magnetic fields leads to high energy collision between particle in the sun core that creates new particle and increase the sun mass.
3. All the stars in the galaxy create new mass so the total mass and the size of the galaxy is increasing.
4. The stars in the galaxy eject dust that freefall to the galactic center super massive black hole. Thorough the dynamo effect the gravitational potential energy of the dust is converted to magnetic fields.
5. As the galaxy mass and size increase, distance arm of the galaxy is detached form the main galaxy to create a new galaxy.
6. Galaxies spawn new galaxies and the total number of galaxies in the universe increase.
7. The universe expands and accelerates from the increase in the number of the galaxies.
8. The Big Bang cosmological model is replaced by a new cosmological model that resembles the steady state theory.
without fusion, how do you account for the suns energy budget?
How do you account for solar neutrinos at the appropriate energy levels?
How do you account for magnetic fields which decline with the square of the distance? If magnetic fields from the center of the galaxy effect the sun, the limit of the field strength is as close to zero as you can get.
One must first understand the science before you write a paper: the authors discription of dark energy, magnetic fields, Einstein, the Big Bang aren't just wrong, they are embarrassing.
As science, this paper is a heaping, steaming pile of crap.
can'I see the french version, think you
hai
As calculable from a cube sphere,the forming of baby galaxies from the parent galaxy will be limited to 4 sequences only,the fifth sequence will be back and equal to the original galaxy.
If it goes well with the sun ,then other planets too will be massing up electromagnetic configurations ending up as volcanic eruptions from internal to the outside tensile surface in a systemic correlation with energic time,correlation with other planetary tugs and influences of vective dimensional calculable forces which are predictable and observeable.
This is correct and my researsh into the area sure supports this. Sun has newer been a reactor and newer will be.
and mostly all others
im pretty sure this violates the 2nd law
Garbage
Holy crap for crap. First it was y2k, then global warming is getting weirder and weirder, then i have to think about the earth actually gaining volume over the millenia, NOW THIS?
But it MAKES SO MUCH SENSE...
thanks for sharing...
Your document has been indexed by the following search engines:
Google Bot has been here 1,052 times.
Yahoo! Bot has been here 977 times.
MSN Bot has been here 92 times.
Baidu Bot has been here 1 time.
More from this Publisher
More from this Publisher